Thursday, May 23, 2024
shipping and freight resource services
HomeBill of LadingOver height cargo crushed due to discrepancy in bill of lading -...

Over height cargo crushed due to discrepancy in bill of lading – who is responsible..??

Here’s a very unique question from Michael about Over height cargo crushed due to discrepancy in bill of lading..

Hi Hariesh

I have an issue where the HBL states cargo OOG. MBL does not reflect this.

The over height cargo in an open top container was therefore not managed as OOG and the over height contents were crushed by spreader during discharge.

Line would have captured the HBL details onto their MBL and sent this to Forwarding Agents (I presume). Are Freight Forwarders liable for not checking the MBL? or are Line liable for not correctly capturing HBL details?


Michael, thanks for raising this question.. There are two issues here..

Image credit :
Image credit :
  1. The issue of damage to the cargo
  2. The issue of possible incorrect documentation

Coming to the first issue, an Out of Gauge (OOG) is when a cargo’s size exceeds the height, width or length of a standard container..

Generally, any shipping line, port, chief officer, stevedore or operation superintendent worth their salt know the importance and techniques of handling OOG cargo properly and safely..

Whether the bill of lading declares the OOG or not, these OOG cargoes are loaded/discharged by sight and surely someone would have noticed that the cargo is over height..

There are many people and computer systems involved in the physical discharge operation.. So, personally, I am quite surprised that no one noticed that the cargo was over height and a normal spreader was used to discharge the cargo thereby crushing it..

If this happened as you mentioned, the blame for this mishap firstly would lie squarely with the stevedoring company or the port operators utilised by the shipping line to handle the discharge of the cargo..

The Master of the vessel and consequently the shipping line are also responsible, since the master of the ship is responsible for the safety of the ship and cargo, and he must supervise the work of the stevedores for general safety..

In this case, since the vessel/master knows that the cargo was over-height when it was loaded, they should have taken care when discharging the same cargo..

While a bill of lading performs 3 important functions, advising the stevedores or port operators HOW to discharge any cargo is NOT one of them.. Shipping lines have special cargo lists or manifests covering OOG, Reefer, Hazardous cargoes.. This list will indicate how many OOG cargoes are on board and the container details.. OOG cargoes are also indicated on the ships bayplan..

Even with all these above people involved and the processes involved, if it still happened, then it was a total failure to follow basic shipping principles from everyone’s side..

Coming to the second issue – there are several questions regarding this..

  1. As per your info, the HBL showed the correct OOG details.. But you don’t say if the HBL was issued by the freight forwarder you contracted or was it issued by someone else..??
  2. If it was issued by the FF you contracted, then was he also the person submitting the bill of lading details to the shipping line for the issuance of the MBL..??
  3. The entity that submitted the bill of lading details was supposed to cross check the bill of lading details submitted and the MBL issued.. If the details were not submitted, then it is that entity’s fault..
  4. Was the cargo “declared” as over-height at the time of booking..?? If not, then the shipper or their agent will be liable for non-declaration..
  5. If so, then the shipping line also cannot be fully absolved from liability because, if the cargo was booked as over-height, then they should have cross checked the booking vs shipping instructions received and the MBL issued..
  6. They would have declared the cargo as over-height when loading the cargo and updated their manifests/special cargo lists accordingly..

So, to answer your question about who was responsible :

  1. In the first instance, the shipping line, their stevedore and their vessel/master for not noticing that the cargo was OOG when discharging and using the incorrect equipment to discharge the cargo
  2. In the second instance, the entity who did not advise the shipping line that the cargo was OOG via the bill of lading details for any mismatch of documents

Liked the content..??

Sign up here to receive the best and most reliable content in the industry for free..




Hariesh Manaadiar
Hariesh Manaadiar
I am Hariesh Manaadiar, the Founder of Shipping and Freight Resource.. I have been in the dynamic shipping and freight industry for over three decades and have worked in several sectors.. I share my experiences and knowledge of the industry through this blog for those looking for help in the industry.. Stay subscribed for more free useful content about shipping, freight, maritime, logistics, supply chain and trade..


  1. Dear Mr Hariesh

    i think that the shipping line who hide the type of container with agreement of the shipper , because when we book a special cntr ?
    like OOG how the shipping line dont know that ? also how shipping line hide this important information


  2. Insurance company “might ” accept to pay some costs but this depends on the value of the cargo, the amount of the insurance, the cause and the responsability of this damage

    According to La Haye / Visby rules, if a shipping line can prove that there was a misdeclaration of shipper they can be considered as free of any charge on damage or loss of the cargo; first lesson of claims in shipping is : A shipping Line rarely Loses…

    Concerning this case i’d be curious about lashing of cargo at POL; most certainly the lashing was not proper and master shouldn’t have accepted.

    Concerning BL the measurements of oog are almost alway automatically indicated on MBL and on cargo manifest sent to all pod and vessel crew,
    if HBL didn’t indicate this OOG it’s the forwarder’s fault and therefore there insurance should be held responsbile

  3. Hi!

    The basic question here is the type of contract between seller and buyer. If the contract is a shipment contract on trade terms like “FOB” or “CFR” then seller’s duties are fully discharged once the cargo is safely stowed on the ship.

    The property in the cargo passes to the buyer at “Port of Loading” on cargo getting on board.

    When cargo gets damaged at “Port of Discharge”, the buyer being the owner has to seek remedy from insurance and can’t refuse payment to the seller.

    If payment is covered by L/C, the bank can not refuse as the MBL is clean.


  4. The basic question here is what type of contract term was finalised. If it was a shipment contract i.e. “F” or “C” term, then seller’s duty is discharged with safe stowing of the cargo on the ship. When damage takes place at the time of discharge, the property has already passed on to the buyer and buyer has to honour payment liability.The buyer has the insurance remedy separately available.

  5. If such damage occurs is there any way of claiming damages cost from Insurace company? thanks, Priyantha


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.



Sign up below to receive the best and most reliable industry content for free..



FBX - Freight Indices